Counterparty Risk: A Review
Stuart M. Turnbull ()
Additional contact information
Stuart M. Turnbull: Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204
Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2014, vol. 6, issue 1, 241-258
This review provides formal definitions of the terms credit value adjustment (CVA) and debt value adjustment (DVA). Estimating these quantities requires modeling the probabilities of default and the loss given default, recognizing the dependence structure among all these inputs. In practice, marginal distributions are used and a copula function assumed. Although it has long been known that different copula functions can produce very different price estimates, keeping marginal distributions constant, there is little empirical evidence about the appropriate form of function to use for modeling default dependence. This review discusses the use of collateral for risk mitigation and its effects on CVA. Regulators have argued that standardized contracts should be cleared through central counterparties (CCPs). However, there are arguments against CCPs.
Keywords: counterparty risk; CVA; DVA; CCP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G01 G13 G20 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:refeco:v:6:y:2014:p:241-258
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annual Review of Financial Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Series data maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().