Supervisory Stress Tests
Andreas Lehnert () and
Additional contact information
Andreas Lehnert: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551
Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2015, vol. 7, issue 1, 339-355
We describe the background, design choices, and particular details of stress tests used as part of an overall supervisory regime, that is, their formal integration into the ongoing prudential supervision of banks and other large financial institutions. We then describe how the US Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Act stress testing (DFAST) regime is designed and what that means for the macroprudential versus microprudential nature of US supervisory exercises. We argue that routine stress tests have the potential to substantially change the nature of the supervisory process. We also argue that a great deal depends on the philosophy underpinning modeling decisions, which has not received as much attention as scenario design, disclosure, or other stress test design choices.
Keywords: bank capital; bank stress testing; bank supervision (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
Working Paper: Supervisory stress tests (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:refeco:v:7:y:2015:p:339-355
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annual Review of Financial Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().