EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Consumer Surplus with Apology: A Historical Perspective on Nonmarket Valuation and Recreation Demand

Spencer Banzhaf

Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2010, vol. 2, issue 1, 183-207

Abstract: When economists first turned to applied benefit-cost analysis in the 1930s and 1940s, prices were the only widely accepted measure of benefits. Perhaps surprisingly, economists did not consider measures like consumer surplus, which seemed quite foreign. Consequently, when they turned to nonmarket valuation for goods like outdoor recreation, their constructed demand curves seemed less informative than a simple equilibrium price. As they struggled with how to make use of such information, natural resource economists set important precedents for the larger profession in coming to consumer surplus as a new measure of benefits. By creating important precedents and learning through practice, they shaped the discipline as much as they were shaped by received theory. At the same time, by coming to these notions in the context of political debates, they were also shaped by the norms of the state.

Keywords: benefit-cost analysis; history of economic thought; outdoor recreation; welfare economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 Q26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103936 (application/pdf)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:reseco:v:2:y:2010:p:183-207

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.annualreviews.org/action/ecommerce

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annual Review of Resource Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-07
Handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:2:y:2010:p:183-207