Agricultural Trade: What Matters in the Doha Round?
David Laborde Debucquet and
Will Martin
Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2012, vol. 4, issue 1, 265-283
Abstract:
This survey concludes that including agriculture in the negotiations was particularly important economically. Although agricultural exports are less than 10% of merchandise trade, the high and variable protection in this sector appears to account for the majority of the cost of distortions in global merchandise trade. Within agriculture, most of the costs appear to arise from trade barriers levied on imports, because these barriers tend to be high and variable across products and over time and are levied by many countries that do not use subsidies. The diverse interests of participants resulted in very complex proposals and a tendency for countries to focus on the political costs of an agreement, rather than on the potential economic benefits. The negotiations faced a need for balance between discipline in reducing tariffs and flexibility in managing political pressures. Although the approach of providing flexibilities on a certain percentage of tariff lines is seriously flawed, the proposed modalities still appear to provide worthwhile market access. There need to be better ways of dealing with developing countries' concerns about food price volatility while reducing the collective-action problems resulting from price insulation.
Keywords: agricultural policy; food policy; trade policy; WTO; Doha Development Agenda; tariff cuts; market access; domestic support (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F17 O24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114449 (application/pdf)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
Related works:
Working Paper: Agricultural trade: What Matters in the Doha Round? (2013) 
Working Paper: Agricultural trade: what matters in the Doha round ? (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:reseco:v:4:y:2012:p:265-283
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.annualreviews.org/action/ecommerce
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annual Review of Resource Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().