EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

(The Economics of) Discounting: Unbalanced Growth, Uncertainty, and Spatial Considerations

Thomas Sterner and Efthymia Kyriakopoulou ()

Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2012, vol. 4, issue 1, 285-301

Abstract: The economics of climate change and the various measures that should be implemented to reduce future damages are highly tied to the use of cost-benefit analysis. Traditional approaches ignore the fact that environmental amenities do not experience the same growth rate as do most of the sectors in the economy, which leads to changing relative prices. Uncertainty should also be considered, especially when one is conducting cost-benefit analysis involving the long-run damages from climate change. This article reviews some theoretical approaches to the economics of discounting and discusses issues associated with unbalanced growth, uncertainty, and spatial discounting.

Keywords: relative prices; unbalanced growth; spatial discounting; environmental amenities; cost-benefit analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 H43 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114507 (application/pdf)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:reseco:v:4:y:2012:p:285-301

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.annualreviews.org/action/ecommerce

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annual Review of Resource Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:4:y:2012:p:285-301