Key Risk Indicators reloaded

Gerrit Jan van den Brink () and Marc Leipoldt ()
Additional contact information
Gerrit Jan van den Brink: Risk Sigma GmbH, Königstein im Taunus, Germany
Marc Leipoldt: Global Risk Advisory Services, Zutphen, Netherlands

Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie Articles, 2022, vol. 96, issue 5-6, 165-171

Abstract: Although Key Risk Indicators have been a staple for Operational Risk Management reports in financial institutions for years now, they are rarely drivers for action and their relevance is waning. The authors argue that, for Key Risk Indicators to become more relevant, they should be recast as predominantly business (first line of defence) driven and made practical rather than theoretical. After describing the current state of Key Risk Indicators and the future for such indicators in case no action is taken, an ideal situation is outlined and five recommendations are presented that serve as practical steps towards that ideal state.

Keywords: Key; Risk; Indicators; financial; Institutions; risk; management; operational; risk; operational; resilience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mab-online.nl/article/80730/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arh:jmabec:v:96:y:2022:i:5-6:p:165-171

DOI: 10.5117/mab.96.80730

Access Statistics for this article

Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie Articles is currently edited by Chris D. Knoops

More articles in Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie Articles from Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Teodor Georgiev ().