Modern personal subsidiary plots of villagers and townspeople: historical dynamics, functions, spatial differences

Tatiana G. Nefedova () and Ulyana G. Nikolaeva ()
Additional contact information
Tatiana G. Nefedova: Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
Ulyana G. Nikolaeva: Faculty of Economics, The Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Population and Economics, 2019, vol. 3, issue 1, 91-106

Abstract: The article deals with the economic, geographical and sociological analysis of personal subsidiary plots of rural residents and citizens in modern post-reform Russia. The authors consider the specifics of individual household plots of rural residents, analyze the reasons for the rise of such establishments, and then decrease in their number. The features and distribution of homestead farms of urban dwellers, who own countryside homes (dacha), in connection with the processes of urbanization and partial de-urbanization are also investigated. An assessment of the contribution of personal subsidiary plots to the total volume of agricultural products is given. The question of a formal or informal status of personal subsidiary plots, as well as their role in the social and economic life of rural and rural-urban dwellers, is raised. It is proved that an individual subsidiary plot in rural areas performs both a usual function of food production for own consumption (meeting up to 30-40% of the need for vegetables and fruits; at plots with poultry and small cattle — up to 60 – 70% of meat and dairy product needs), and plays a socio-communicative function of maintaining reciprocal family relations, and also solves recreational tasks. It is emphasized that the production, distribution, consumption and sales of products from the personal subsidiary plots are usually carried out within the framework of informal economic relations and that statistics are poorly capable of taking them into account.

Keywords: personal (individual) subsidiary plot; rural population; depopulation; urbanization; recreation; dacha; homestead farms; reciprocity; rural-urban continuum (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O P Z (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://populationandeconomics.pensoft.net/article/34903/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arh:jpopec:v:3:y:2019:i:1:p:91-106

DOI: 10.3897/popecon.3.e34903

Access Statistics for this article

Population and Economics is currently edited by Irina E. Kalabikhina

More articles in Population and Economics from ARPHA Platform
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Teodor Georgiev ().