Accounting for Goodwill at Private versus Other Companies: Amortize, Impair, or Write Off

Dahli Gray () and Monica Jorge ()
Additional contact information
Dahli Gray: Graduate School Professor Keiser University 1900 W. Commercial Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309, USA
Monica Jorge: Staff Auditor with Cherry Bekaert LLP, Miami, FL 33183,USA

Business, Management and Economics Research, 2015, vol. 1, issue 4, 44-49

Abstract: This article documents increased diversity in financial accounting practice. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) standard-setting process for the Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-18 is used as documentation. The FASB ASU 2014-18 was approved by a slim margin of four to three of the FASB members. This indicates continuing controversy around accounting for goodwill that relates to the public interest goal of similar accounting for similar transactions and events. This article analyzes the content within the 52 Comment Letters submitted in response to 18 questions asked by the Private Company Council (PCC) that lead to the promulgation of the FASB ASU 2014-18. Private companies are to include non-marketable intangibles in the account goodwill that non-private companies are to continue measure and report separate from goodwill. Plus private companies are allowed to either amortize or test for impairment in measuring and reporting goodwill. Non-private companies are to test for impairment. Non-private companies do not have the option of using amortization as part of the measurement and reporting process regarding goodwill. This diversity in measuring and reporting goodwill decreases progress toward the public interest goal of comparability of financial reports. Comparability is a significant quality thought to improve decision usefulness of information.

Keywords: Accounting standard-setting process; Accounting for goodwill; Private companies; Non-private companies. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/bmer1(4)44-49.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=8&month=08-2015&issue=4&volume=1 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arp:bmerar:2015:p:44-49

Access Statistics for this article

Business, Management and Economics Research is currently edited by Dr. Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah

More articles in Business, Management and Economics Research from Academic Research Publishing Group Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ().