Assessing EFL Learner,s Authorial Stance in Academic Writing: A Case of Out Theses and Dissertations Authors

Zelda Elisifa Sam and Elizabeth Kyara
Additional contact information
Zelda Elisifa Sam: Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Open University of Tanzania, Tanzania
Elizabeth Kyara: Department of Foundation Studies, Institute of Continuing Education, Open University of Tanzania, Tanzania

English Literature and Language Review, 2017, vol. 3, issue 8, 74-81

Abstract: This study was an assessment of authorial stance using engagement framework by Tanzanian EFL academic writers so as  to reveal the linguistic resources that enable authors to present a stance toward the research they are reviewing and presenting. Specifically, the study sought to i) explore pattern of expanding and contracting in presenting authorial stance in the selected dissertations and theses, ii) assess the authors’ linguistic resources for expanding moves, and iii) assess the linguistic resources for contracting moves by the authors. The study adapted Martin and White (2005) engagement system framework focusing on heterogloss.  The study was conducted at the Open University of Tanzania. We analyzed the engagement of 20 EFL post-graduate theses and 20 Dissertations at Master’s and Doctoral levels by the EFL candidates/authors and used document analysis as a sole tool of data gathering. In conducting analyses of these texts, each was ?rst broken down into non-embedded clauses and analyzed based on the engagement system belonging to heterogloss categories then their respective sub-categories. Findings revealed that the dissertation/theses writers varied in their mode of registering their stances towards the subject matter and thence proven heteroglossic rather than monoglossic. In that way they were able to establish their authorial territory and claim their visibility or presence instead of being compilers or reporters of findings by others. It was further noted that author stance was more noticed in literature review and introduction chapters.

Keywords: Authorial stance; EFL; Academic writing; Engagement framework. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/ellr3(8)74-81.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=9&month=08-2017&issue=8&volume=3 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arp:ellrar:2017:p:74-81

Access Statistics for this article

English Literature and Language Review is currently edited by Dr. Tecnam Yoon

More articles in English Literature and Language Review from Academic Research Publishing Group Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ().