EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Influence of Selected Institutional and Technological Factors on the Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Technologies in Maize Farming in Mzimba South, Malawi

Owen Austin Banda*, Maurice Ongalo Udoto and Joel Kipkemoi Ng’eno
Additional contact information
Owen Austin Banda*: Department of Agricultural Education and Extension, Faculty of Education and Community Studies, Egerton University, Kenya
Maurice Ongalo Udoto: Department of Agricultural Education and Extension, Faculty of Education and Community Studies, Egerton University, Kenya
Joel Kipkemoi Ng’eno: Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Educational Management, Faculty of Education and Community Studies, Egerton University, Kenya

Journal of Agriculture and Crops, 2020, vol. 6, issue 3, 16-26

Abstract: Sustainable Agriculture Technologies (SATs) significantly contribute to addressing the negative effects of land degradation, poor soil health and climate variability in the agriculture sector. Despite efforts made by different stakeholders in promoting SATs to improve maize productivity in Mzimba South in Malawi, the adoption of the technologies among small-scale farmers remains unsatisfactory. As a result, most of the farmers continue to realize low maize yields. A survey was conducted from July to September 2019 to investigate the influence of selected institutional and technological factors on the adoption of SATs in maize farming among the small-scale farmers in Mzimba South. A multi-stage sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of 132 small-scale maize farming household heads. Data was collected using a researcher-administered questionnaire. Multivariate probit, ordered probit and ordinary least square (OLS) models were applied to determine the influence of the selected factors on the adoption of SATs at ? level of .05 using STATA and SPSS. Qualitative data was analyzed by a deductive approach, in which responses were categorized and summarized under the related themes. The study established that the adoption of SATs was significantly influenced by membership in farmer organizations (FOs), access to extension services, and the levels of relative advantage and complexity associated with the SATs. The findings of the study implied that the Government of Malawi and relevant stakeholders in the agriculture sector need to train and recruit more extension field staff to improve coverage and frequency of extension services delivery on sustainable agriculture. The stakeholders should also promote affiliation of the small-scale farmers to FOs to improve access to agricultural extension services and production resources on sustainable farming. In addition, efforts should be made to develop and promote affordable mechanization options for reducing farm drudgery associated with the implementation of SATs. Furthermore, the Government of Malawi should facilitate the formulation, enactment, and enforcement of local by-laws for safeguarding the SATs and their related inputs (or raw materials) against vandalism, livestock damage, and bushfires.

Keywords: Sustainable agriculture technologies (SATs); Adoption; Maize farming; Mzimba south; Malawi (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jac6(3)16-26.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/14/archive/03-2020/3/6 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arp:jacarp:2020:p:16-26

DOI: 10.32861/jac.63.16.26

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Agriculture and Crops is currently edited by Dr. Michael Adegboye

More articles in Journal of Agriculture and Crops from Academic Research Publishing Group Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2020:p:16-26