EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Teachers’ Corrective Feedback Strategies in Assessing Essay Writing

Noor Hashima Abd Aziz* and Arsaythamby Veloo
Additional contact information
Noor Hashima Abd Aziz*: School of Languages, Civilisation & Philosophy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Arsaythamby Veloo: School of Education & Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018, 208-212 Special Issue: 6

Abstract: Feedback has been an important topic of discussion in language learning. Although research on written corrective feedback is available, there is little research on the specific strategies employed by teachers in order to provide feedback on their students’ essay writing. This paper reports part of a larger research. One of the objectives of this study was to explore corrective feedback strategies employed by the English as a second language (ESL) teachers and English language expert raters when assessing their students’ written essays. This study used qualitative case study which involved 12 participants. Data were collected through interviewing nine English language teachers and three English language expert raters to obtain their pedagogic practices in providing written corrective feedback. The strategies identified are based on Ellis’s typology of strategies for providing written corrective feedback. The findings showed that the preferred written corrective feedback strategy used by the teachers and raters was Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback with Direct Corrective Feedback and Focused Corrective Feedback used by only a few of them. This study has pedagogical implications in that it explains the ESL teachers/expert raters’ pedagogical attitude and practices towards error correction and their preferred written corrective feedback strategies in dealing with error correction.

Keywords: Written corrective feedback; Essay writing; English as a second language (ESL) teachers; Expert raters; Metalinguistic corrective feedback (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi6.22.208.212.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/6/4 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:208-212

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Social Sciences Research is currently edited by Dr. Paola Magnano

More articles in The Journal of Social Sciences Research from Academic Research Publishing Group Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:208-212