The Role of Onomatopoeic and Predicative Words in Formation of Concretizing Relations in Tatar Language

Damir H. Husnutdinov*, Ramilya K. Sagdieva, Ramil H. Mirzagitov and Gulnaz T. Karipzhanova
Additional contact information
Damir H. Husnutdinov*: Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia
Ramilya K. Sagdieva: Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia
Ramil H. Mirzagitov: Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia
Gulnaz T. Karipzhanova: S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomov St 64, Pavlodar 140000, Kazakhstan

The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018, vol. 4 Special Issue: 1, 28-31

Abstract: This article examined the roles of onomatopoeic and predicative words in the formation of a concretizing relations in the Tatar literary language. For many years, language onomatopoeic and predicative words in Tatar language had been studied as a part of the modal speech. Since the end of the 20th century, onomatopoeic words have been included into the list of notional parts of speech. Predicative words also stand between the notional and service parts of speech, that is, as a separate unit. In syntactic terms, both of these can be attributed to notional parts of speech, as they form word combinations. In this scientific work, the authors were first to study the concretizing relations between onomatopoeic words, verbs, and nouns and also between predicative words and nouns, pronouns, and verbs. The article also shed light on semantic nuances and means of communication.A concretizing link refers to an expression of a concretizing relation between words using special means of communication. The category of concretizing relations includes a rather wide range of semantic nuances between notions; therefore, the means of their expression are very diverse. The scientific novelty of this article was determined by the functional-semantic analysis of the concretizing relationship, wherein onomatopoeic and predicative words were either dependent or dominant components.The research method was determined by the goals and objectives of the work, as well as by the specificity of the material being studied. The main research method was descriptive-analytical, with its main components: observation, generalization, and interpretation. Comparative-historical method was also used for the purpose of comprehensive analysis of linguistic features of speech, allowing determining certain tendencies in the development of grammatical system of national literary language. The study also involved comparative-typological and statistical methods.

Keywords: Concretizing relation; Pronouns; Verb; Noun; Onomatopoeic words; Predicative words; Means of expression. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/SPI-1-JSSR18-22-28-31.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/11-2018/1/4 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:28-31

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Social Sciences Research is currently edited by Dr. Paola Magnano

More articles in The Journal of Social Sciences Research from Academic Research Publishing Group Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Managing Editor ().