EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

China’s Market Economy Status Adoption of Surrogate Country Methodology After 2016

Liying Zhang ()

Journal Global Policy and Governance, 2016, vol. 5, issue 2, 3-15

Abstract: After the expiration of paragraph 15(a) (ii) of the Accession Protocol of the People’s Republic of China on 11 December 2016, it is still in doubt whether China’s market economy status will be automatically recognized. On 12 May 2016, the European Parliament adopted a non-legislative resolution to deny China market economy status. Through the analysis of the criteria of market economy status and the application of surrogate country methodology, this article comes to the conclusion that , in any case, no definite connection exists between awarding a country non-market economy status and applying the surrogate country methodology to this country’s products. Regardless of China’s market status, Paragraph 15(a) of the Accession Protocol of the People’s Republic of China cannot be cited as the legal basis for applying the surrogate country methodology after its expiration. Finally, this article explore the possible way for WTO importing members to apply the surrogate country methodology substituting Paragragh 15(a) of the Accession Protocol of People’s Republic of China, which is through the term “particular market situation”, as stipulated in Article 2.2 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement

Keywords: Market Economy Status; Anti-dumping; Surrogate Country Methodology; Particular Market Situation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/149/97 (application/pdf)
Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:3-15:id:149

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal Global Policy and Governance from Transition Academia Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Giorgio Dominese ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:3-15:id:149