Roll Out the Big Canon: A Subjective Academic Narrative
Josie Arnold
International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2012, vol. 2, issue 6, 929-941
Abstract:
Following a brief survey of creative writing vs literary studies, and looking at both in relationships to social networking sites, in this paper, I consider the ways in which we assume that some personal writing is ‘creative’. In doing so, I question the use of literature as a model for creative writing. At the same time I canvass the necessity for wide reading as a basis for creative writing. I suggest that the subjective self is inadequate as a singular basis for creative writing and that the author is stirring from the deathbed not to attain the position of the ‘god’ but rather to provide leadership in a world obsessed with the subjective self as data. In doing so, I look at some the technology of the present assessing some electronic implications of the death of the author and the birth of the subjective self, at social networking and/as creative writing, and at warnings about the power of the culture industry. Finally, rather plaintively, I call for rolling back out the big canon itself. My theoretical framework of narrativity and the subjective academic narrative is shown as another paradox within this discussion.
Keywords: Narrativity; Literary studies; Creative writing; E-discourse (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5007/article/view/2271/3525 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asi:ijoass:v:2:y:2012:i:6:p:929-941:id:2271
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Asian Social Science from Asian Economic and Social Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Robert Allen ().