Considerations regarding the constitutional obligation determining the financing source for budgetary expenditures

Florentina Camelia Stoica ()
Additional contact information
Florentina Camelia Stoica: Law Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, 2016, vol. 6, issue 2, 156-164

Abstract: This study examines the relation between constitutionality and opportunity in order to adopt regulations in matters of economy and finance. The analysis concerns in particular the regulation process on budgetary expenditures, respectively the constitutional obligation to indicate the source of financing for these expenses. The legal and jurisprudential landmarks identified are likely to reveal the delicate issues of balancing the concurring interests, as well as the constitutionalisation tendency of certain obligations imposed by the law of public finances and, respectively, the Fiscal Responsibility Law in the sense of transforming them into “constitutional criteria” through the application of Article 138 (5) of the Constitution.

Keywords: financing source; budgetary expenditures; constitutional review; opportunity; national budget. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K10 K34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v22/11%20Stoica.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:156-164

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law from Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin-Silviu Sararu ().