EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Solving causes by report to the principles of the Strasbourg Court

Calin-Ioan Rus ()
Additional contact information
Calin-Ioan Rus: Faculty of Law, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania

Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica), 2017, vol. 7, issue Special, 250-265

Abstract: This study aims to find a new perspective for interpretation in cases where the judgments of the international courts (in particular the European Court of Human Rights) are contradictory or create uncertainty, so that they cannot be effectively considered when judging. It is known that the national judge must take into account the judgments of the Strasbourg Court to prevent a possible condemnation of the Romanian state, but when the conventional block is not unitary, we need to find a benchmark that helps us correctly solve the case. We believe that, in these circumstances, relying on the principles of law is necessary, and the principle of trust in justice can be a new, determining factor, in choosing a concrete legal solution. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness this interpretation, a practical case will also be analysed, on the basis of which the implications of such a method can be highlighted. Moreover, the principle of trust in judgments could be used in other cases similar to the practical situation presented and could become a concrete way of interpretation in cases of case law overruling or case law uncertainties, so that the individual’s rights are not injured

Keywords: case law overruling; ECHR; legal interpretation; legal principles; prosecutors’ papers. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K14 K38 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v11/18.%20Rus.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:special:p:250-265

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica) from Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Law Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Catalin-Silviu Sararu ().

 
Page updated 2018-01-10
Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:special:p:250-265