Considerations concerning the prohibition of use of the probation period in the individual labor contract (according to the provisions of article 33 of the Romanian Labor Code)
Ana Vidat ()
Additional contact information
Ana Vidat: Law Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies; Lawyer, member of the Bucharest Bar Association, Romania
Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica), 2018, vol. 8, issue 3, 772-778
The probationary period is the most appropriate way of verifying the professional skills - among the possible ones - given that during the performance of the individual labor contract, the skills of the employee can be tested. The objective of this study is to analyze the ban on the use of the probation period in the context of art. 33 of the Labor Code. Thus, we propose to discuss relatively the employer's ability to employ probationers through successive employment in a maximum of 12 months. We appreciate that it is useful to establish the practical implications of the legal provisions outlined above - in the context in which the probationary period is the most useful way of prior checking of the persons applying for employment.
Keywords: individual employment contract; probation period; denial clause; verifying professional skills; successive hiring. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:772-778
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica) from Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Law Department Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin-Silviu Sararu ().