EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Challenges and perspectives of administrative judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia Abstract: The development of administrative judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia went through various phases after its independence in 1991. 16 years after its independence, in late 2007 the Administrative Court was established as one of the holders of the judiciary in judicial system. Before the establishment of this court, the administrative dispute was under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The Administrative Court appears as a guarantor for exercising the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the laws before the administrative bodies, which provide court protection in the event of an unlawful conduct by the administration. For this reason, administrative justice plays a key role in the lives of citizens who seek it when they consider that state authorities are preventing the enjoyment of a constitutional or legal right, or that they are imposing an obligation outside the legal rules. With this paper the author by explaining the process of development of the administrative judiciary using: normative legal method, comparative legal method, systematic and objective interpretative methods, will focus on the specific analysis of ineffectiveness of administrative justice in the practice, which is due, first of all, to the lack of a mechanism for implementing the judgments of the Administrative Court

Jeton Shasivari ()
Additional contact information
Jeton Shasivari: Associate professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, South East European University, Tetova, Republic of North Macedonia

Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, 2019, vol. 9, issue Special, 60-76

Keywords: administrative bodies; administrative dispute; administrative justice; administrative case law; full dispute; dispute for annulment of administrative act. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K23 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An9vS/5.%20Jeton%20Shasivari.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asr:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:special:p:60-76

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law from Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin-Silviu Sararu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:special:p:60-76