Comparative evaluation of productivity, before and after privatization By using added value productivity model (in Persian)

Reza Khaleghi (r.khaleghi@yahoo.com) and Ali Akbar Pourmousa (alipourmousa@ut.ac.ir)
Additional contact information
Reza Khaleghi: Azad University
Ali Akbar Pourmousa: Azad University

The Journal of Planning and Budgeting (٠صلنامه برنامه ریزی و بودجه), 2016, vol. 21, issue 1, 123-143

Abstract: Privatization has been one of the most important aspects of the economic transition from a Centralized economy to a market economy In order to have maximum productivity. Theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggests an effective performance incentive mechanism and corporate governance, and increase their productivity if the lack of government interference. In this study, after identifying privatization purpose in Iran, we By using value- added productivity model, evaluate Total productivity, production resource productivity (Labor material capital) and performance productivity (Sales/employment profit /employment ) effects associated with privatization of state-owned enterprises, in five year’s pre and post privatization. The results show, privatization of state-owned enterprises from 1994 to 2011 through stock exchange, dosn’t not increased total productivity. Also, from the resource productivity approach, privatization, increases the labor productivity but don’t increase materials and capital productivity. From the performance productivity approach, only increase Sales/employment and doesn’t increase profit /employment. Keywords: privatization, productivity, By privatization enterprises, value- added productivity model.

Keywords: privatization; productivity; privatizated enterprises; added value productivity model. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-720-en.pdf (application/pdf)
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-720-en.html (text/html)
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-720-fa.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:auv:jipbud:v:21:y:2016:i:1:p:123-143

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Planning and Budgeting (٠صلنامه برنامه ریزی و بودجه) from Institute for Management and Planning studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nahid Jebeli (info@jpbud.ac.ir this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).