The Effect of Openness on Corruption in the Selected MENA Countries (in Persian)

Mohammadreza Kohansal () and Milad Aminizadeh ()
Additional contact information
Mohammadreza Kohansal: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Milad Aminizadeh: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

The Journal of Planning and Budgeting (٠صلنامه برنامه ریزی و بودجه), 2018, vol. 22, issue 4, 125-146

Abstract: Corruption is one of the most important determinant factors in economic fields, specifically in trade; and nowadays, it is crucial to know what factors reinforce or mitigate it. Trade openness is an influencing factor on corruption, and the extant literature has two different general perspectives facing that. The first perspective emphasizes that openness has a negative impact on corruption, while the second idea believes that such impact is positive. Hence, the aim of this paper is to answer this question: “what is the effect of openness on corruption in selected MENA countries?” To this end, our analysis is based on panel data that covered 10 MENA countries for 2003–2014. The results indicate that, along with the negative effect of per capita income and institutional quality such as ruling law, political stability and regulation quality, the effect of openness is also negative and significant. In other words, increase and expansion of trade and creating a competitive environment, as well as interacting with countries with systemic structure and less corruption, contributes to improving the institutional and legal environment in the MENA countries, so that, consequently, corruption would decrease. Accordingly, since the rank of Iran in openness and corruption is tenth and second among ten countries respectively, it is recommended that reducing trade barriers such as import tariff and creating a free market, would result in the fall of corruption through reducing monopoly rents of authorities in the field of trade, especially in imports.

Keywords: Openness; Corruption; MENA Countries; Panel Data; Ruling Law; Political Stability; Law Quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1467-en.pdf (application/pdf)
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1467-en.html (text/html)
http://jpbud.ir/article-1-1467-fa.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:auv:jipbud:v:22:y:2018:i:4:p:125-146

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Planning and Budgeting (٠صلنامه برنامه ریزی و بودجه) from Institute for Management and Planning studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nahid Jebeli ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).