A Kantian Analysis of the Fallibility of Moral Intuition

Wei, Zichen (Alex)

Journal of Psychology & Human Behavior, 2025, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-4

Abstract: This study evaluates the reliability of moral intuition in ethical reasoning, juxtaposing its spontaneous, subjective nature against the universal, rational framework of Kantian morality. Drawing on perspectives from ethical intuitionism, empirical psychology, and Kantian philosophy, it examines how moral intuitions are shaped by experience, susceptible to external influences, and prone to inconsistency. Through analyses of moral dilemmas, including the trolley problem and the impact of framing effects, the investigation highlights the variability of intuition. In contrast, Kant's categorical imperative establishes a priori, universal principles as the foundation of ethical truth, rejecting intuition as a dependable moral guide. While intuition may often align with moral outcomes, its inherent susceptibility to error undermines its credibility. Conversely, reasoned deliberations should be advocated as the path to achieving moral certainty.

Keywords: kantian morality; ethical intuition; empiricism; rationality; a priori; categorical imperative; universality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://soapubs.com/index.php/JPHB/article/view/254/267 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:axf:jphbaa:v:2:y:2025:i:1:p:1-4

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Psychology & Human Behavior from Scientific Open Access Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Yuchi Liu ().