 The Political Anatomy of Economic Crises – The Case of Turkey: 1945-2018Hurşit Güneş
Yildiz Social Science Review, 2021, vol. 7, issue 2, 91-109 Abstract: The foundations of economic and financial crises are conventionally attributed to the tech-nicalities of macroeconomic fragilities. Yet political instability (caused by the deficiency of democracy and/or unfunctional political institutions) can also be considered as a major de-terminant of economic instability by deteriorating the debt dynamics through depreciation of the national currency or the ascent of interest rates. Analogously, political instability, for instance, disruption of cabinet durability, to a large extent depends on the economic perfor-mance of governments. Hence, though most economists conceive macroeconomic fragilities as the mother of all crises, the issue is rather complex and there is an intermingled relationship between political and economic crises. Besides, as macroeconomic fragilities or structural imbalances are results of inappropriate pol-icies, the political rationale and the social motives behind such misleading policies should also be well comprehended. For that purpose, a comprehensive elaboration will enable the nega-tion of the prevalent argument that it is only economic factors that instigate crises. This study investigates the political background of eight economic crises in Turkey, since 1946. In all of them, significant levels of devaluation and retraction of growth are observed. All of the devaluations were indispensable, except the first one in 1946 which was discretionary and pre-cautionary. The crises of 1978/9, 1994 and 2001 ended with drastic austerity programmes, albeit the others, where governments eschewed them by macroeconomic adjustment through fiscal and monetary measures. The 2001 twin-crises was so peculiar, as it was to a large extent caused by the design-defection of the programme recommended by the IMF. Yet, since the attempt of financial liberalization, all of the other economic crises were prompted by capital flights. The 2008/9 crisis was due to global contagion and the 2018 crisis was caused by the tensions in the bilateral relations with the US, amid high private sector foreign debt. In all economic crises, the profligate fiscal stance of governments has played a prominent role, as well as the continuation of appreciated exchange rates, but such choices had a political rationale. Finally, in the background of all the economic crises in Turkey, we observe stern political instability. Political instability not only restricts the rational decision-making capacity of the policy-maker, particularly if it converges into a political crisis, but also exacerbates economic sentiment, either by consumer confidence or by investor appetite, which subsequently results in economic decline. It also intensifies risks and causes exchange rate depreciation as well as interest rate hikes, both Keywords: Democracy; economic crises; emerging market; political crisesJournal: Yildiz Social Science Review (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aye:journl:v:7:y:2021:i:2:p:91-109 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Yildiz Social Science Review from Yildiz Technical University Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.