EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Common pitfalls when mitigating cyber risk: Addressing socio-behavioural factors

Öykü Işik, Yanya Viskovich and Si Pavitt
Additional contact information
Öykü Işik: IMD, Switzerland
Yanya Viskovich: Accenture Switzerland, Switzerland
Si Pavitt: Recyber, UK

Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 2024, vol. 8, issue 1, 6-23

Abstract: Although humans constitute a pivotal dimension of the cyber security attack surface, prevailing approaches are often ineffective at addressing human risk. From the vantage point of three key socio-behavioural perspectives, a critical analysis of contemporary cyberattacks and cyber security practices offers insights and a range of opportunities to manage the human factor in cyber security. First, the role of metaphors in shaping cyber security discourse, particularly militaristic analogies, is analysed, supported by research advocating for careful metaphor selection to enhance comprehension, foster shared responsibility and reduce counterproductive assumptions. Secondly, the paper explores the significance of psychological safety within organisational cultures. It discusses the concept of a ‘just culture’ and the impact of cultivating an environment that encourages risk reporting. The discussion expands to highlight the interconnectedness of security culture with broader organisational values, emphasising the critical role of leadership in shaping resilient cyber security postures. Finally, an examination of blame-centric practices and associated consequences provides an insight into less visible forms of victim blaming, such as phishing tests and traditional training-centric strategies. It offers a psychological perspective on the distinction between blame and accountability and highlights the need for a shift away from a compliance-based focus towards a positivist approach. In presenting insights from these three key perspectives, this paper offers opportunities to innovatively manage socio-behavioural risk in cyber security, critiquing prevailing approaches that fail to do so. By linking metaphors, psychological safety and blame-centric practices, it contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the human dimension in cyber security and provides a foundation for advancing effective risk management strategies.

Keywords: cyber security culture; human factor; behavioural risks; victim blaming; cyber security metaphors; cyber resilience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/8629/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/8629/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2024:v:8:i:1:p:6-23

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2024:v:8:i:1:p:6-23