Comparable evidence in residential property valuations

Philip Santo

Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 2015, vol. 3, issue 4, 295-303

Abstract: When residential property valuation files are critically examined, usually after some time has elapsed since the valuation was completed, the supporting documentation relating to the comparable evidence used to justify the valuation is frequently found to be incomplete or inadequate. This paper reviews the process of selecting and applying comparable evidence with particular emphasis on the need for structured analysis and recording. It contrasts historic practice with current requirements and draws on the RICS Information Paper Comparable Evidence in Property Valuation (2012) and some relatively recent court cases. It suggests that for many residential valuation file documents the term ‘site notes’ is a misnomer and the entire file should more accurately be regarded and described as the valuation record. It suggests adopting a structured approach for dealing with comparables to reduce the risk of potential difficulties when files are later reviewed for any purpose.

Keywords: valuation; residential; comparable; evidence; analysis; record (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/1467/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/1467/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:jbsav0:y:2015:v:3:i:4:p:295-303

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().