Going to the third surveyor under Section 10 of the Party Wall etc. Act 1996

Steve Campbell
Additional contact information
Steve Campbell: Steve Campbell Associates, The Counting House

Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 2019, vol. 8, issue 2, 175-180

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to convince surveyors practising in matters under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (the Act) that going to the third surveyor to resolve a dispute is not a failure — in fact, the opposite is true. The paper aims to give a steer on how referrals can and should be made, as well as providing examples of how to make them, when and for what reason. There is a great deal of confusion within the profession generally as to the role of the third surveyor, and the paper aims to throw light on the subject in a readable way which can be referred to again and again — becoming timeless as a reference document. The intention is to provide the reader with a greater knowledge of the principles behind a referral to a third surveyor and the required skills to do so.

Keywords: third surveyor; who–when–why–how; reason; determination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/5097/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/5097/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:jbsav0:y:2019:v:8:i:2:p:175-180

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().