Digital assets and tax transparency: Navigating the new US tax reporting regime

Jill Dymtrow and Chris Saveri
Additional contact information
Jill Dymtrow: Director of Tax Information Reporting, Gemini Trust Company, USA
Chris Saveri: Head of Content, Global Relay, UK

Journal of Financial Compliance, 2025, vol. 8, issue 3, 257-270

Abstract: The US digital asset industry has been growing at a significant pace since 2012 when the first mainstream digital asset exchange offered the opportunity for customers to buy and sell the first digital asset, bitcoin, through bank transfers. Digital assets, or ‘cryptocurrency’ as it is commonly known, quickly outgrew its status as a niche alternative investment. According to a Pew Research Center survey, almost 20 per cent of American adults owned cryptocurrency in 2023.1 Along with growth in popularity, bitcoin (the original cryptocurrency) has grown in value. On 31st December, 2012, the closing price for a single bitcoin was US$13.45, compared to its all-time high of US$108,135 (as of 17th December, 2024). Based on this, it is fair to assume that long-term investors made some significant gains in bitcoin trading. Since digital asset exchanges are not subject to the same tax information reporting requirements as traditional financial institutions, there has been speculation by digital asset investors that sales of digital assets were not subject to the same taxation regimes as traditional financial investments. The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued its first notice regarding the taxation of ‘virtual currency’ in 2014 (Notice 2014–21).2 The exclusion of tax information reporting guidance on digital asset sales, however, made it difficult for the IRS to identify taxable gains recognised by investors. This paper will set the stage by first diving into the history of both US tax information reporting and the evolution of digital assets. We will then address the recent US tax legislation and regulations issued by the US Government to attempt to mitigate the perceived tax gap for digital asset sales. We will then conclude by highlighting the challenges that these rules pose to digital asset exchanges and taxpayers, and what we can collectively do to prepare for their implementation.

Keywords: social media risk; regulatory compliance; records and information management; marketing rules; consumer duty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E5 G2 K2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/9144/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/9144/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:jfc000:y:2025:v:8:i:3:p:257-270

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Financial Compliance from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().