EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The rise of the casino resort

James Morgan

Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 2010, vol. 3, issue 4, 385-394

Abstract: The Gambling Act 2005 has thrown a potential lifeline to some seaside resorts wishing to use public access casinos as cultural regeneration tools. The general perception that the UK’s seaside resorts are in decline has been addressed by various regeneration strategies. The spatial reorganisation and transformation of resorts through a cultural lens is a popular tactic to recreate place as an environment for consumption, but this may create tensions within host communities. There are questions to be asked as regards the scale, style and representation of this form of leisure activity. Heavyweight regeneration involving moral and values adjustments creates conflict and needs special consideration. The paper argues that the intended regeneration benefits of this legislation will be achieved only through significant engagement with local communities. Taking serious account of their visions for their towns and how casinos fit within those visions is vital.

Keywords: Casino; seaside; regeneration; culture; leisure; tourism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R00 Z33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/3967/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/3967/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2010:v:3:i:4:p:385-394

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2010:v:3:i:4:p:385-394