A customer- and business-driven healthcare access model

Mark T. Fleischer, Chris Schneider, Terry Brandt, Jill M. Robinson and Janine (Coelho) Kamath
Additional contact information
Mark T. Fleischer: Mayo Clinic, Management Engineering & Consulting, SWMN Region, USA
Chris Schneider: Mayo Clinic, Management Engineering & Internal Consulting, USA
Terry Brandt: Mayo Clinic, USA
Jill M. Robinson: Mayo Clinic, SWMN Scheduling Operations, SWMN Region, USA
Janine (Coelho) Kamath: Mayo Clinic, Management Engineering & Internal Consulting, USA

Management in Healthcare: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 2021, vol. 5, issue 2, 115-126

Abstract: Whether centralised or decentralised, healthcare access models provide varying degrees of benefit to customers and to the organisations they serve. Mayo Clinic Health System in Southwest Minnesota, United States, is a community-based practice of 23 clinics and 6 hospitals that has undergone an evolution of its access model. In 2010, a centralised access model was adopted, including the physical location of schedulers, which was expected to offer greater efficiency, flexibility and staff savings. However, in 2016, the region noted concerning trends of low patient and provider satisfaction with scheduling, decreasing patient access and less-than-optimal patient throughput, all subsequently contributing to declining financial performance. Early concerning trends led to further investigation of practice areas and geographical sites that had notable appointment capacity yet low patient access and throughput. Provider productivity rates, calendar management and patient access varied substantially. Performance in scheduling operations was below par because of limited connection with the practice. The combination of practice variation and a centralised access model was causing an increase in scheduling errors, consistent rework/rescheduling, less-than-optimal patient access, low provider calendar fill rates and high levels of dissatisfaction for patients and providers. Our group was tasked with analysing the problems and developing a new scheduling model. This paper describes the resulting model: a hybrid of centralised and decentralised models, which promised the benefits of both and involved transformation in clinical practice operations and access management. Standardisation for provider scheduling and template management was enhanced. Pods of scheduling personnel were embedded in practice areas. The proximity of the pods to physician, nursing and other clinical staff allowed for increased collaboration and communication. The hybrid model improved access metrics for average speed to answer, abandoned call rates, patient access and throughput, financial performance, and patient and provider satisfaction.

Keywords: centralised; decentralised; healthcare access; hybrid; provider calendar management; scheduling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I1 I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/6125/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/6125/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:mih000:y:2021:v:5:i:2:p:115-126

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management in Healthcare: A Peer-Reviewed Journal from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().