Risk-neutral versus objective loss distribution and CDO tranche valuation

Roberto Torresetti, Damiano Brigo and Andrea Pallavicini

Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 2009, vol. 2, issue 2, 175-192

Abstract: This paper considers the risk-neutral loss distribution as implied by index collateralised debt obligation (CDO) tranche quotes through a ‘scenario default rate’ model as opposed to the objective measure loss distribution based on historical analysis. The risk-neutral loss distribution turns out to assign greater probability to large realisations of the loss with respect to the objective distribution, thus implying the well-known presence of a risk premium. In the spirit of Elton et al. (2001), the paper measures this premium, regressing the tranche excess returns against the three Fama-French factors, augmented by the credit index excess returns. However, on the basis of the limited available sample data, it finds no evidence of a significant risk premium. Following Tarashev and Zhu (2007), the paper quantifies the correlation premium, pricing CDO tranches and indices under two distributions: risk-neutral and objective. Instead of building a time nonhomogeneous default dependency as per Tarashev and Zhu, the paper assumes a time-homogeneous default correlation, as can be found in the S&P CDO Evaluator. En passant, the paper analyses the implied risk-neutral default-rate distributions calibrated from April 2004 through April 2006, noting the persistence through time of the distinctive ‘bump’ in the distribution tail.

Keywords: default-rate distribution; CDO; CDO tranches; perfect copula; implied copula; transition matrices; rating classes; risk premium; recovery rate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E5 G2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/1111/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/1111/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:rmfi00:y:2009:v:2:i:2:p:175-192

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().