The relevance of the country and sector effect in global equity returns around COVID-19 and developed and emerging markets

Francis Boateng-Frimpong, Amel Bentata and Rémy Cottet
Additional contact information
Francis Boateng-Frimpong: Former Investment Analyst, Pictet Asset Management Ltd, UK
Amel Bentata: Senior Quantitative Analyst, Pictet Asset Management SA, Switzerland
Rémy Cottet: Senior Quantitative Analyst, Pictet Asset Management SA, Switzerland

Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 2024, vol. 17, issue 2, 213-230

Abstract: This study explores the historical and current explanatory power of country classification and Global Industry Classification Standard sector classification on global equity returns in the equally weighted MSCI All Country World Index. R2 is a crucial statistical tool for risk and portfolio management professionals because it serves as a measure of how much of a portfolio's movements can be explained by factors. Its significance lies in its ability to quantify how dependent a portfolio's risk is on those factors. The country classification's adjusted R2 is dominant in global equities, driven by its dominance within emerging markets (EM). Within developed markets (DM), the country effect's slight dominance over the sector effect has decreased over time — the two have become more balanced since 2015, with the sector effect having a slightly higher adjusted R2 value. There was a drop in the R2 for all classifications during the COVID-19 pandemic. This drop was most significant in the country classification, with a sharp decline to 8.3 per cent, well below its previous historical minimum of 12 per cent, before it rebounded to its historical range. This change drove further analysis into the country effect across EM and DM, where the large drop and rebound were primarily within EM. During this time, the sector effect dropped but remained within its historical range, implying a larger loss of diversification benefit in country effect than in sector effect. The impact of Chinese stocks on country effect within EM is also investigated. In 2018, there was a large influx of Chinese companies into the index, which caused a decline in country diversification and hence a reduction in explanatory power within EM. China's rapid and strict COVID-19 response, early tight monetary policy and regulatory crackdown have since caused it to become increasingly differentiated from the rest of EM, increasing country diversification within EM and causing the accentuated rebound in explanatory power of the country effect post-COVID-19. Risk managers can use these results to validate the use of sector and country classifications in portfolio construction.

Keywords: GICS classification effect; country effect; diversification; portfolio construction; regression; emerging markets; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E5 G2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hstalks.com/article/8365/download/ (application/pdf)
https://hstalks.com/article/8365/ (text/html)
Requires a paid subscription for full access.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aza:rmfi00:y:2024:v:17:i:2:p:213-230

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions from Henry Stewart Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henry Stewart Talks ().