The Diffusion of Balanced Scorecard from the Perspective of Adopters: Evidence from Australia
Davood Askarany () and
Hassan Yazdifar ()
Additional contact information
Davood Askarany: Department of Accounting & Finance, Business School, University of Auckland, NEW ZEALAND, http://staff.business.auckland.ac.nz/daskarany
Hassan Yazdifar: Salford Business School - University of Salford, Manchester, UK, http://www.salford.ac.uk/business-school/business-academics/hassan-yazdifar
Review of Economics & Finance, 2018, vol. 14, 71-82
The purpose of this paper is to explore the shortcomings of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a performance measurement tool, and to examine the extent of association between its diffusion and the characteristics of its adopters in practice. This study uses a survey approach and targets registered members of Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) in Australia. The results show that ignoring the risks, environmental and sustainability factors as well as neglecting the concerns/rights of relevant stakeholders are the key shortcomings of the BSC in practice. The findings further confirm that it is vital to distinguish between the diffusion of the BSC as a practice (one single tool) and as a process (a chain of different activities). Because some attributes of adopters are only associated with the initial decisions to adopt (or not) the BSC (as a practice) but not with the sequential implementation stages of its adoption (as a process) and vice versa.
Keywords: Balanced Scorecard; Sustainability; Risk; Stakeholders¡¯ rights; Performance measurement; Diffusion of innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L10 M41 M48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bap:journl:180406
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
17 Alton Towers Circle, Unit 101 Toronto, ON, M1V3L8, Canada
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Carlson
More articles in Review of Economics & Finance from Better Advances Press, Canada 17 Alton Towers Circle, Unit 101 Toronto, ON, M1V3L8, Canada.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlson ().