Public administration modernization: regularities of normative concept application

Arvydas Guogis, Vainius Smalskys, Iveta Reinholde, Mantas Bileišis, Daniel Klimovsky and Nataliia Gavkalova ()
Additional contact information
Arvydas Guogis: Mykolas Romeris University
Vainius Smalskys: Mykolas Romeris University
Iveta Reinholde: University of Latvia
Mantas Bileišis: General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania
Daniel Klimovsky: Comenius University
Nataliia Gavkalova: Warsaw University of Technology

Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2024, vol. 3, issue 13 (129), 70-78

Abstract: The object of this study is to assess administrative reforms and change from the point of view of theoretical administrative models of hierarchical (traditional) administration, New Public Management (NPM), and New Public Governance (NPG) in Latvia, Lithuania, and Slovakia. Normative models offer a critique of legacy administrative practices; their wholesale implementation is seldom practical or successful. Reforms framed as “modernization” in these countries over the past three decades have generally followed the principles of NPM. Although policy arguments for introducing elements of NPG can be observed in the studied cases, the paper argues that NPG’s rhetorical attractiveness for resolving perceived shortcomings of other models lacks specific implementation mechanisms that would be viable within the existing institutional framework of the studied countries. Factors, such as the relatively small size of Latvia, Lithuania, and Slovakia, and obvious benefits of EU integration, appear to have moderated reforms to a point that core institutional features have become stable, and are also similar among the three countries: the dominance of hierarchical administrative model with rigid separation of powers structure and strong courts that can adjudicate administrative decisions, with numerous NPM inspired “modernization” measures, including the introduction of various interactive public services. The paper’s findings support the idea that Latvia, Lithuania, and Slovakia are administrative systems that have stable core governance institutions, and national public administrations modernize various aspects of their operation by introducing elements of NPM and NPG within the executive, but not reviewing the basic setup of these institutions. From this point of view, the findings are in line with the assumptions of the normative model of Neo-Weberian State (NWS)

Keywords: administrative modernization; new public governance; neo-Weberian state; comparative public administration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/download/304594/298426 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:baq:jetart:v:3:y:2024:i:13:p:70-78

DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2024.304594

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies from PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iryna Prudius ().