SOME TRAITS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN SOCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL SELECTION

Dan C. Stegaroiu
Additional contact information
Dan C. Stegaroiu: Faculty of European Studies, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, 2006

Abstract: The author tried to point out main traits, common as well as different, between selections at social level versus selection at institutional level. Based on this analysis it is easy to understand why evolution depends mostly of the value of people promoted in rank and file based on social selection as well as on the pattern of institutional selection. So, throughout selection type will be promoted leaders as well as managers or pseudo-leaders as well as pseudo-managers. Selection is well known and broadly applied within agriculture process and mostly ignored and contested within human environment. It was easy, at the end, to accept selection within institution just because, in time, became obvious that person nominated in rank and file had a huge influence on the profit of that institution. So, in our days selection of managers became a common process. Contrary, at social level nobody speaks about selection in spite of its outcome: quality of elected leaders. The social responsibility may be considered as a main trait in order to find out the quality of leaders. So, to measure this responsibility of leaders represent “a stick” to point out the quality of any leaders. The responsibility for people within theirs span of authority could be also a stick to measure the quality of managers. At social level, that is a space of interaction between different groups of interest as well as of self interest, represented by parties, trade union, owners associations and so on as well as the common interest of citizens represented by non-governmental organizations and of course the interest of the main social actors. At social level are made the most important decisions, at this level is built up the social environment. The quality of human environment largely depends on the quality of leaders. The quality of leaders is a main factor for the quality of common life of citizens. As any where, quality depends on selection. Of course the selection process, as it is organized, will lead to a certain quality of leaders as well as managers elected/nominated. Quality of leaders as well as managers is the core condition for rising up a human environment in which individuals feels that is worthy to live, that they have pretty good chances to contribute with theirs full creativity for the betterment of community.

Keywords: selection; social responsibility; pseudo-leader; pseudo-manager; quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://tbs.ubbcluj.ro/RePEc/bbn/journl/2006_2_7_Stegaroiu.pdf Revised version, 2006 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bbn:journl:2006_2_7_stegaroiu

Access Statistics for this article

JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA is currently edited by Cornelia Pop

More articles in JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA from Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cornelia Pop ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).