Nepotistic Practices in the Private Sector

Sheryl A. Nicolas, Katerina S. Abaño, John Dave R. Abelado, Denzel Jhon E. Frany, Jheena Jamaica J. Villeges and Sheryl R. Morales
Additional contact information
Sheryl A. Nicolas: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Major in Human Resource Management, Quezon City Branch, Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Katerina S. Abaño: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Major in Human Resource Management, Quezon City Branch, Polytechnic University of the Philippines
John Dave R. Abelado: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Major in Human Resource Management, Quezon City Branch, Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Denzel Jhon E. Frany: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Major in Human Resource Management, Quezon City Branch, Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Jheena Jamaica J. Villeges: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Major in Human Resource Management, Quezon City Branch, Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Sheryl R. Morales: Research Management Office, Polytechnic University of the Philippines – Quezon City Branch (Thesis Adviser)

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2022, vol. 6, issue 9, 307-313

Abstract: There is a prevalence of nepotism in all organizations. Numerous studies have attempted to examine nepotism, but very few have focused on the Philippine context. Through the perspectives of private-sector employees, this qualitative study explored workplace nepotism. Literature and participants’ data indicate that nepotism has significant negative effects on an organization. Low morale promotes workplace discontent, stress, and demotivation. Inefficiency costs the company money. Employees and management may experience communication and leadership difficulties due to nepotism. Although not illegal, it can cost a business money if it leads to discrimination and an unpleasant workplace. It is unethical because it favors relatives or close acquaintances. It disregards merit, competency, and skill. In private companies, nepotism maintains the business in the family, but it must be used with prudence. As it has negative implications, it is not a smart strategy for the survival, development, or expansion of a business. The family should be approached with discretion.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... -issue-9/307-313.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/ ... -the-private-sector/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:6:y:2022:i:9:p:307-313

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().