EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Expectation vs. Reality: Food Service, Price, and Promotion of a Fast-Food Restaurant

Shane B. Donato, Jemima Faye V. Andres, Chin-chin A. Ang, Jan Cyrel Joy J. Collado, Rhiana Mashielle E. Infante and John Michael C. Ibarra
Additional contact information
Shane B. Donato: Hospitality and Tourism Management Department, Saint Mary’s University
Jemima Faye V. Andres: Hospitality and Tourism Management Department, Saint Mary’s University
Chin-chin A. Ang: Hospitality and Tourism Management Department, Saint Mary’s University
Jan Cyrel Joy J. Collado: Hospitality and Tourism Management Department, Saint Mary’s University
Rhiana Mashielle E. Infante: Hospitality and Tourism Management Department, Saint Mary’s University
John Michael C. Ibarra: Hospitality and Tourism Management Department, Saint Mary’s University

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2024, vol. 8, issue 4, 1498-1516

Abstract: In the Philippines, deceptive advertising has been present in the market. The presence of ads from fast-food restaurants has also made consumers wonder if it is accurate in what they offer. With this evident deception in the market, consumers of a certain fast-food chain may face a similar problem in buying their food, whether they are getting what they are paying for. This study used a quantitative descriptive method that includes administering survey questionnaires in Likert form to diners of the fast-food chain who are aged 18-59 years old, excluding those who buy through the drive-thru and take-out. In the conducted study on February 2023, the findings reveal that among the 103 respondents, female emerging adults and young adults are mostly consumers of a fast-food chain in Bambang and dine occasionally. In terms of service, it shows that crew members who are not friendly have the highest frequency in the items. In price, the item that got the highest agreement was the additional fees when upgrading drinks, which the cashier did not disclose, and respondents consider it a deception. Regarding promotion, not receiving the same item as advertised got the highest agreement. Also, respondents did not experience other deceptions, resulting in them not doing any actions to address identified deception. The results have shown that there is no evident deception in terms of service, price, and promotions other than those identified as it receives a high frequency; nonetheless, it still falls under no perceived deception. It demonstrates that the mentioned fast-food restaurant fulfills its promised advertisements and continues improving its service and avoiding deception for customer retention.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... ssue-4/1498-1516.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/arti ... ast-food-restaurant/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1498-1516

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:1498-1516