EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Development and Validation of E-Module in Teaching Earth’s Motion for Grade 6

Rex E. Alcisto, Monera A. Salic-Hairulla, Sotero O. Malayao, Joy R. Magsayo and Ellen J. Castro
Additional contact information
Rex E. Alcisto: Mindanao State University-Illigan Institute of Technology/College of Education, Department of Science and Mathematics Education
Monera A. Salic-Hairulla: Mindanao State University-Illigan Institute of Technology/College of Education, Department of Science and Mathematics Education
Sotero O. Malayao: Mindanao State University-Illigan Institute of Technology/College of Education, Department of Science and Mathematics Education
Joy R. Magsayo: Mindanao State University-Illigan Institute of Technology/College of Education, Department of Science and Mathematics Education
Ellen J. Castro: Mindanao State University-Illigan Institute of Technology/College of Education, Department of Science and Mathematics Education

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2024, vol. 8, issue 6, 1136-1148

Abstract: This study used a quantitative-qualitative descriptive. The research design used in this study was One-Group-Pretest-Posttest Design. The data collection technique in this study used a test that is giving a pre-test for learners before the treatment is done by using electronic module-based teaching material. After treatment, learners will be given a post-test again to see the effectiveness of the application of electronic modules. The quantitative research data were obtained from the performance of the respondents in the achievement test. Qualitative research data, on the other hand, were obtained from the perception of the learners towards the use of e-module. The researcher chose the respondents by purposive sampling method which is a sampling technique where the researchers rely on their own judgment when choosing members of the population to participate in the study. The findings from the validation of the e-module focused on four key factors: Content Quality, Instructional Quality, Technical Quality, and Other Findings. In assessing Content Quality, the majority of components received ratings ranging from 3.4 to 4, interpreted as Very Satisfactory (VS). The total points for this factor were 39, indicating that it passed the criterion. Similarly, Instructional Quality was evaluated, with most components scoring between 3.8 and 4, also interpreted as VS. The total points for this factor were 39.8, resulting in a passing evaluation. Technical Quality assessment revealed that the majority of components received ratings of 3.2 to 4, again interpreted as VS. The total points for this factor were 50.4, indicating a passing evaluation.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... ssue-6/1136-1148.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/arti ... -motion-for-grade-6/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:1136-1148

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:6:p:1136-1148