Interests of IGAD Member States in the South Sudan Peace Process, 2013- 2023
Keynan Shamim Aden,
Mwea Caroline Wandiri and
Otieno Isaiah Oduor
Additional contact information
Keynan Shamim Aden: Department of Security, Diplomacy and Peace Studies, Kenyatta University
Mwea Caroline Wandiri: Department of Security, Diplomacy and Peace Studies, Kenyatta University
Otieno Isaiah Oduor: Department of Security, Diplomacy and Peace Studies, Kenyatta University
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2024, vol. 8, issue 8, 3237-3244
Abstract:
Three civil wars have been witnessed in South Sudan. The first Sudanese Civil war began in 1955 pitting troops from the Central government of Sudan and the Southern Sudan Liberation Movement (SSLM) rebels. This war ended after the Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972. The second war began in 1983 and ended in 2005 with the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between. A referendum in 2011 overwhelmingly voted for the independent state of South Sudan. Two years (2013) after the birth of the South Sudan nation a third civil war erupted. The civil war pitted former Vice-President Dr Riek Machar against the government of President Salva Kirr of South Sudan. The humanitarian crisis and abuse of human rights associated with the civil conflict prompted the international community through regional powers to intervene and restore stability in South Sudan. The war in South Sudan has persisted despite the efforts by IGAD and other players in the peace process. This study this study examines the interests of IGAD member states in the South Sudan peace process between 2013 and 2023. Anchored on the realism theory of international relations this study argued that interests of IGAD member states has tended to slow down the peace process in South Sudan between 2013 and 2023. This study 1takes the form of an explanatory research1design. Purposive and snow balling sampling techniques were used to identify 410 respondents for field interviews. The study purposively identified 385 South Sudanese refugees in Nairobi. A total of 25 other respondents who included; representatives of the warring factions in South Sudan residing in Kenya, IGAD officials, EAC officials and Diplomats from IGAD member states were also interviewed. This study noted that in as much as different players have significantly contributed to the peace process; interveners’ interests have tended to slow down the peace process in South Sudan.
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... ssue-8/3237-3244.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/arti ... e-process-2013-2023/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:8:p:3237-3244
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan
More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().