EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Meta-cognitive beliefs in Major Depressive Disorder: A Comparison of Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder and Healthy Control

Dr. Rupashree Brahma Kumari and Abinash Mishra
Additional contact information
Dr. Rupashree Brahma Kumari: School of Psychology, Gangadhar Meher University, Sambalpur, Odisha, India
Abinash Mishra: School of Psychology, Gangadhar Meher University, Sambalpur, Odisha, India

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 2025, vol. 9, issue 5, 4440-4449

Abstract: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental illness affecting over 320 million people, equivalent to 4.4% of the global population (World Health Organization, 2017). MDD is primarily characterized by feelings of sadness, indifference, hopelessness, and persistent thoughts (Kanter et al., 2008; Otte et al., 2016). In recent years, there has been growing interest in identifying the cognitive aspects linked to MDD. There’s mounting evidence suggesting that impaired metacognition, the ability to assess and evaluate one’s own thought processes and actions, plays a significant role (Hoven et al., 2019; Rouault, Seow, et al., 2018; Trauelsen et al., 2016). Several theories, including the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF, Wells & Matthews, 1994), propose that dysfunctional metacognitive processes contribute to the onset and persistence of mental disorders. According to the S-REF theory, certain forms of metacognitive beliefs may predispose individuals with depression to adopt counterproductive responses to their thoughts and inner experiences, resulting in ineffective coping strategies (Wells, 2011). One particular response pattern, known as the Cognitive-Attention Syndrome (CAS), involves excessive engagement in worry, rumination, heightened focus on threats and negative information, and excessive self-focus. CAS also includes ineffective regulation strategies such as avoidance and thought suppression (Sun et al., 2017). This syndrome gradually emerges due to metacognitive beliefs, such as the idea that worrying and ruminating serve a purpose, or that thoughts and emotions are inherently negative and uncontrollable and should be avoided and suppressed (Sun et al., 2017). Over time, CAS ensnares individuals with depression in prolonged emotional turmoil, leading to persistent thinking patterns and contributing to the onset and perpetuation of the clinical disorder.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ ... ssue-5/4440-4449.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/arti ... and-healthy-control/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:4440-4449

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science is currently edited by Dr. Nidhi Malhan

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Pawan Verma ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-22
Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:4440-4449