The Differences in Parents’ Involvement Methods During Children’s Piano Learning and Their Impacts

Liuyi Chen and Yidong Lin
Additional contact information
Liuyi Chen: Manhattan School of Music, US
Yidong Lin: University of Manchester, UK

Art and Society, 2026, vol. 5, issue 1, 39-45

Abstract: With the comprehensive implementation of quality education in China, piano learning has become an important choice for children’s artistic enlightenment. As the core participants in children’s piano learning process, parents’ participation styles vary, and these differences have a profound impact on children’s learning outcomes, interest development, and mental health. This paper combines literature review and empirical research to classify parents’ participation styles into three types: controlling, accompanying, and permissive. Moving beyond descriptive categorization, this study systematically analyzes the multi-dimensional mechanisms through which these modalities mediate children’s motivation, technical mastery, and emotional safety. By addressing the structural “feedback vacuum” inherent in early instrumental practice, the study deduces an optimal path for supportive participation. It argues that shifting the parental role from a technical micromanager to a meta-cognitive facilitator is crucial for sustained musical development, providing actionable insights for optimizing the family-based music education ecosystem. Multiple main body coordinated intervention can effectively promote.

Keywords: children’s piano education; parental involvement; participation methods; musical literacy; multi-support system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.paradigmpress.org/as/article/view/2135/1978 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:5:y:2026:i:1:p:39-45

DOI: 10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2026.03.005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Art and Society from Paradigm Academic Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().