A Review of Literature on the Work-Life Balance of Female University Faculty from the Perspective of Patriarchal

Kaijiao Zhang
Additional contact information
Kaijiao Zhang: Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, China

Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 2025, vol. 4, issue 4, 10-16

Abstract: This paper reviews the challenges faced by female university faculty in balancing professional advancement and maternal responsibilities, framed within the theoretical context of patriarchy. Drawing on feminist, the study traces how patriarchal norms have historically defined women’s roles in both private and public spheres, particularly in the Chinese context. Although China promoted formal gender equality after 1949, the persistence of traditional family structures and implicit gendered expectations continues to constrain women’s career mobility. The analysis highlights the dual burden faced by female academics: while they benefit from relatively stable institutional environments, they remain subject to performance evaluations that overlook the disproportionate domestic labor they perform. Furthermore, the structural barriers in academic promotion, research productivity, and leadership appointments also highlight the disadvantaged position of female teachers. The paper argues that addressing these disparities requires not only legal protections and flexible policies but also gender-sensitive reforms in academic evaluation systems, expanded institutional support, and greater political recognition of women’s contributions. Ultimately, the professional development of female academics is not just a matter of individual equity but one of broader social and political significance.

Keywords: patriarchy; feminism; motherhood; female university faculty; gender inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1686/1514 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:10-16

DOI: 10.63593/SSSH.2709-7862.2025.07.002

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Studies in Social Science & Humanities from Paradigm Academic Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().