To support trust and trustworthiness: punish, communicate, both, neither?
Mark Pingle () and
Additional contact information
Rattaphon Wuthisatian: Southern Oregon University, USA
Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2017, vol. 1, issue 1, 61-68
We examine the effects of punishment, communication, and their interaction on trust and trustworthiness. Our findings suggest that, when communication alone is available as an option for the trustor, using it roughly doubles the ability the trustor has to elicit trustworthiness, so communication is not cheap talk. When punishment alone is available, a punishment threat has no significant impact on the marginal ability of trust to elicit trustworthiness. If the two mechanisms are available and implemented together, the choice to punish completely cancels out the positive effect of the choice to communicate. For policy, these findings stress the importance of communication relative to contracts enforced with material penalties.
Keywords: trust; trustworthiness; punishment; communication; cooperation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C70 C71 C91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:61-68
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy is currently edited by Roger Frantz
More articles in Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy from Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SABE ().