EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

THE IMPACT OF THE BRITISH MODEL ON ECONOMIC GROWTH

György Simon, Jr

Economic Annals, 2007, vol. 52, issue 174-175, 45-72

Abstract: The paper is searching for an answer to the question how the British model affected economic development in its mother country, the United Kingdom . The statistical analysis, models of mathematical economics and econometric investigation make it probable to conclude that there was a substantial difference in success between the Thatcherite and Blairite economic policies; the latter proved more effective. It is particularly remarkable that the Blairite model, connecting privatisation with a successful employment policy, reduced unemployment and social sensitivity, has not only speeded up economic growth but also improved economic equilibrium, curtailing, among others, the budget deficit.

Keywords: economic policy; economic theory; growth models; international analyses and comparisons; globalisation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E10 F43 O40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/174-3.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:beo:journl:v:52:y:2007:i:174-175:p:45-72

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ea.ekof.bg.ac.rs/

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Annals is currently edited by Will Bartlett

More articles in Economic Annals from Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Goran Petrić ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:52:y:2007:i:174-175:p:45-72