Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1995, vol. 13, issue 2, 151-61
Using research designs patterned after randomized experiments, many recent economic studies examine outcome measures for treatment groups and comparison groups that are not randomly assigned. By using variation in explanatory variables generated by changes in state laws, government draft mechanisms, or other means, these studies obtain variation that is readily examined and is plausibly exogenous. This article describes the advantages of these studies and suggests how they can be improved. It also provides aids in judging the validity of inferences that they draw. Design complications such as multiple treatment and comparison groups and multiple preintervention or postintervention observations are advocated.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (485) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: Natural and Quasi- Experiments in Economics (1994)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:13:y:1995:i:2:p:151-61
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Jonathan H. Wright and Keisuke Hirano
More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().