Measuring Substitution in Monetary-Asset Demand Systems
George Davis and
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1996, vol. 14, issue 2, 203-08
The Allen elasticity of substitution (AES) is widely used to study monetary asset substitution and structural demand stability. C. Blackorby and R. R. Russell (1989) show that the AES is uninformative and that the Morishima elasticity of substitution (MES) is the appropriate measure, a point overlooked in the monetary literature. Use of improper measures can lead to incorrect inferences. This paper considers five alternative measures of substitution: the AES; MES; the Hicksian and Marshallian elasticities of demand; and Y. Mundlak's unencountered, but appealing, constant cost elasticity of substitution. Selection of the substitution measure appropriate to respective research questions is addressed.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:14:y:1996:i:2:p:203-08
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Jonathan H. Wright and Keisuke Hirano
More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().