Dynamic Asymptotically Ideal Models and Finite Approximation

Adrian R Fleissig and James L Swofford

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1997, vol. 15, issue 4, 482-92

Abstract: The authors extend W. A. Barnett and A. Jonas's (1983) asymptotically ideal model (AIM) to model for the possibility that the data were generated by a dynamic process. Prediction errors for dynamic and static AIM models are compared for various simulated datasets. Monetary data are also used to evaluate the AIM specifications. There is substantial evidence that an AR(1) correction considerably improves the quality of low-order finite approximations of AIM with the cost of estimating only one additional parameter. Furthermore, restricting a dynamic AIM to approximate only linear homogenous functions often results in severe misspecification.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:15:y:1997:i:4:p:482-92

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.amstat.org/publications/index.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Jonathan H. Wright and Keisuke Hirano

More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().