Policy Analysis of Medical Malpractice Reforms: What Can We Learn from Claims Data?

James Hughes and Edward Snyder

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1989, vol. 7, issue 4, 423-31

Abstract: Selection processes that are inherent in litigation complicate policy-oriented research of medical malpractice tort reforms. In regard to their deterrent impact, the range of potential inferences based on analyses of claim frequency is limited because plaintiffs only file a subset of potential claims. In regard to their impact on litigation costs, researchers often analyze data on claim disposition, but it is difficult to determine whether effects attributed to tort reforms reflect changes in litigant behavior or their influences on the selection of claims. In this article, we evaluate these problems and report results of our study of the effects of medical malpractice reforms on claim disposition.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:7:y:1989:i:4:p:423-31

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.amstat.org/publications/index.html

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Jonathan H. Wright and Keisuke Hirano

More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().