Macroprudential capital tools: assessing their rationale and effectiveness
Laurent Clerc (),
Kalin Nikolov (),
Alexis Derviz (),
Livio Stracca (),
Caterina Mendicino (),
Stéphane Moyen () and
Financial Stability Review, 2014, issue 18, 183-194
In this paper, the authors analyse the rationale for and effectiveness of macroprudential capital tools. They first present the limits of the traditional approach to bank capital regulation and the reasons why developing a more holistic approach is deemed appropriate. They then assess the effectiveness of capital tools (namely capital requirements, countercyclical capital buffers and sectoral risk weights) from a macroprudential perspective in the context of a dynamic general equilibrium model that features the default of the various classes of borrowers (banks, households and firms). Three main results stand out from this exercise: (i) there is generally an optimal level of capital requirements; (ii) the lower the banks’ capital ratio (or the higher their leverage), the greater the scope for amplification of real and financial shocks; (iii) a moderate degree of countercyclical adjustment of capital requirements may significantly improve the benefits of setting these requirements at a high level.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/defaul ... eview-18_2014-04.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bfr:fisrev:2014:18:18
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Financial Stability Review from Banque de France Banque de France 31 Rue Croix des Petits Champs LABOLOG - 49-1404 75049 PARIS. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael brassart ().