The Effects of Language Policy on Minority Languages

Peter Smith

European Journal of Linguistics, 2024, vol. 3, issue 3, 54 - 66

Abstract: Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the effects of language policy on minority languages. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to language policy on minority languages. Preliminary empirical review revealed that supportive and well-implemented language policies significantly contributed to the preservation and revitalization of minority languages. It found that bilingual education programs and media representation were crucial for maintaining linguistic diversity, but their success depended on adequate resources, trained educators, and community involvement. The study also emphasized the importance of community-driven policies, advocating for a bottom-up approach to ensure cultural sensitivity and sustainability. Overall, the research highlighted the need for comprehensive and inclusive language policies to protect and promote minority languages. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Linguistic Relativity Theory, Language Ecology Theory and Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effects of language policy on minority languages. The study recommended integrating sociolinguistic and ecological perspectives into theoretical frameworks, enhancing bilingual and multilingual education, and utilizing modern technology for language preservation. It emphasized robust legislative frameworks to support minority languages, continuous policy evaluation, and active community involvement in language planning. The study also suggested incorporating minority languages into economic and social spheres, promoting international cooperation, and including language preservation in global cultural agendas. These recommendations aimed to advance theory, practice, and policy for better preservation and revitalization of minority languages.

Keywords: Language Policy; Minority Languages; Preservation; Revitalization; Sociolinguistic Perspective (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/ejl/article/view/2054/2448 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bhx:ojtejl:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:54-66:id:2054

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Linguistics from CARI Journals Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chief Editor ().