EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing the Dichotomy Between Ghana’s Complex Tax Provisions and Taxpayers’ Rights: Perspective of Section 42 (5) of Act 915 Mandatory Prepayment of Tax Disputes Before Commencement of Litigation

Ephraim Armstrong Awinbugri, Andrew Kofi Annan and Edmund Nelson Amasah
Additional contact information
Ephraim Armstrong Awinbugri: senior Lecturer, University of Education, Winneba (Codel-Aamusted)
Andrew Kofi Annan: legal Consultant, Minkah-Premo, Osei-Bonsu (Bruce-Cathline & Partners)
Edmund Nelson Amasah: commercial Law Lecturer, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Law

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 2025, vol. 12, issue 5, 1524-1535

Abstract: This article critically examines Ghana’s mandatory prepayment rule under Section 42(5) of the Revenue Administration Act, 2016 (Act 915), which requires taxpayers to pay 30% of disputed taxes (or 100% for import duties) before objections are entertained. Secondary data was adopted in analyzing the Supreme Court’s affirmation of this provision in cases such as Richard Amo-Hene v GRA and explores its interplay with Order 54, Rule 4(1) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules (CI 47), which mandates a 25% prepayment for court appeals. Through a comparative lens, the article contrasts Ghana’s rigid “pay now, argue later†regime with jurisdictions like South Africa (payment suspensions), Nigeria (hardship waivers), and the United States (no general prepayment), highlighting systemic gaps in fairness and accessibility. The study identifies barriers to taxpayer rights, including disproportionate burdens on low-income disputants and opaque waiver mechanisms under Section 42(6). It argues for reforms such as automatic suspension provisions, transparent criteria for waivers, and alignment of CI 47 with Act 915 to eliminate procedural redundancies. The article concludes that Ghana must balance revenue protection with equitable access to justice by adopting internationally informed safeguards against frivolous disputes while protecting genuine taxpayers’ rights.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/d ... ssue-5/1524-1535.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/artic ... before-commencement/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:5:p:1524-1535

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation is currently edited by Dr. Renu Malsaria

More articles in International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation from International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Renu Malsaria ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-04
Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:5:p:1524-1535