EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bloc Voting and Youth Electoral Behavior: A Study on the Role of Religion in University Student Decision-Making

Samuel B. Damayon, Mikaela Nicole B. Montañez, Sandra Isahvel C. Gallera, Gwynette Gyle M. Asuncion, Jesalyn D. Nadia and Leanne Jaye C. Derije
Additional contact information
Samuel B. Damayon: Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines
Mikaela Nicole B. Montañez: Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines
Sandra Isahvel C. Gallera: Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines
Gwynette Gyle M. Asuncion: Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines
Jesalyn D. Nadia: Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines
Leanne Jaye C. Derije: Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, Saint Mary’s University, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 2025, vol. 12, issue 6, 1358-1369

Abstract: The intersection of religion and electoral behavior in the Philippines continues to raise concerns about voter autonomy, particularly among youth voters. This research examined how collective voting practices influence the political independence of university students affiliated with various religious groups. Using a descriptive-comparative research design, a structured questionnaire was administered to 360 registered student voters from different academic departments and religious affiliations within a diverse university community. The study assessed students’ alignment with legal provisions on suffrage, their behaviors toward coordinated voting behaviors, and the degree of perceived influence exerted by religious and social groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests and ANOVA to explore variations in perception based on academic background, sex, and religious affiliation. Findings revealed that participants strongly support constitutional provisions on suffrage and reject electoral misconduct. Participants generally disagreed with the practice of bloc voting but were perceived as moderately influential, with respondents acknowledging its effect on electoral outcomes and the social pressure it creates. No significant differences were found in perceptions based on academic program or sex; however, religious affiliation showed a notable impact on perceived influence. The findings revealed a clear tension between upholding community unity and exercising personal choice. In response, the study proposed an educational initiative that encourages reflective decision-making and enhances awareness of electoral rights. The research offers valuable insight into how institutional, cultural, and spiritual contexts shape student voters’ behavior, contributing to broader discussions on promoting informed and autonomous participation in democratic processes.

Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/d ... ssue-6/1358-1369.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/artic ... ent-decision-making/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:6:p:1358-1369

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation is currently edited by Dr. Renu Malsaria

More articles in International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation from International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Renu Malsaria ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-27
Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:6:p:1358-1369